I recently saw a post on Facebook that had pictures of people on one side and symbols on the other. The caption said "Ideas don't have rights, people do." That sounds fine on the surface, but in reality ideas and people are tangled in such a way that they cannot be separated. One of the comments said that the post was a form of propaganda in favor of discrimination against ideas that you do not agree with. To an extant, I agree with him. Here's why:
1. At what point does an idea become a right?
Let's take marriage for example. Many people on the feed were arguing that the religious idea that gay marriage is wrong cannot impede on the right of others to be married. They ignored the fact that marriage in itself is an idea. In some cultures, the
parents have the
right to choose who their sons or daughters marry. So to them, by me choosing my spouse, I took away the rights of my parents. If we come down to the base of what marriage is (in western society)--love--well I can love whomever I want. Nobody can take away my feelings, emotions, or thoughts. What is marriage but an idea?
2. We identify ourselves by ideas.
This may sound a little strange until we think about what kind of ideas we have been referring to. Religions, Political entities, academic theories, etc. All of these things define us, not because others label us, but because we label ourselves. As humans we have to communicate through words, and those words often become labels. Think about it: Conservative, Academic, Atheist, European, Radical. Even those who claim they wish there were no labels define themselves by labels because they have to. We have to describe ourselves in some way. This is why prejudice is such a hard topic. It's the difference between "Is this person mean to me because they don't like
me?" or "Is this person mean to me because they don't like
my thinking?" Not everyone that says mean things to me hates Mormons, they may just simply not like me as a person. But where is the line?
3. "Victim" mentality and opposites
There have been many examples in recent history of the idea that "if I'm offended then it's oppressive". This is a victim mentality. If people truly had rights, and ideas did not, then I would legally have the
right to ask that a prayer be publicly shared before a basketball game at my high school. Instead, others have put into law an apparent
right to
not hear a prayer said before school events. Really, they have no "natural" right to be free of this, but have instead invoked the law of opposites. Every idea has an opposite. In this case, the law upholds the
idea that religion should be removed from the public circle. On the flip side, if prayer was instead
required then it would again be upholding an idea
not people.

It is important to realize that what we believe and want is not always what others believe and want. With the topic of rights we could take it all the way to the base and say that we are all entitled to the thoughts within our own heads. Anything else that we do is the result of an idea that came from our way of thinking. But in realistic terms, we will always naturally seek ways to express ourselves and our thoughts and ideas. It is nearly impossible to separate the person from the ideas. Rights should be equal, yes. No one way of thinking should be held superior to others when it comes to the law. When it comes to personal judgement, we should not generalize people into groups unfairly. Everyone is different and unique. But in the end, it is impossible to separate the law from ideas, for it is from ideas that laws and customs come into play.